More Kooky Alex Jones

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones has had his prior custody order reversed on the petition of his ex wife. He now is deprecated to walking-ATM / sperm-donor status, like so many other men in our society.

After nine hours of deliberation in the child custody trial involving internet broadcaster Alex Jones, a Travis County jury gave his ex-wife, Kelly Jones, a victory, awarding her joint custody with the right to have their three children make their primary residence with her instead of her husband for the first time since their 2015 divorce.

More at Austin American-Statesman

I am still waiting for Jones to begin using his considerable public presence to open an honest discussion about the abuses of the American divorce courts. Does he have the courage to do this? Brother Boxer is skeptical.

It’s worth noting that another popular celebrity got ground up in the gears of the family law racket a few years ago.

Screen Shot 2017-04-28 at 13.00.05

Michael Moore ended up losing millions of dollars in his divorce, to the boobless, barren pig depicted above. By all accounts, he got railroaded, yet he has yet to make a peep about this travesty. Like Jones, Michael Moore has tens of millions of people who listen to him criticize the status-quo.

The fact that these people are silent, about the things that ought to be most important to a healthy man, is in itself more interesting than their usual act.

Why I Am Not A Christian

One of Brazil’s most popular porn stars caused an uproar with her fellow Evangelical Christians when she said God is totally cool with her job: fucking hundreds of men, and selling the films of this degeneracy to thirsty simps.

The New York Post reports that devoutly religious porn actress Kamilla Werneck caused the furor on the racy TV show Pornolondia, in which she explained why God won’t judge her for her trashy, immoral lifestyle.
Screen Shot 2017-04-28 at 07.45.40

Alex Jones: Male Feminist

Over on the Black Pill, Brother Leeduva writes that conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is in the midst of an entertaining custody battle. A bit of casual digging reveals the details, and it’s even better than I expected.

As the Austin American-Statesman reports, Jones has somehow managed to gain custody of his children after past divorce hearings. Naturally, Jones’ wife doesn’t find this convenient or profitable. So, she’s filing motions and pleadings in the Texas divorce courts to kidnap the children away from him, and pad her pockets at the same time.

Her legal strategy seems to be an attempt to paint Jones as unhinged, which has forced him, through his legal team, to confess the obvious.

At a recent pretrial hearing, attorney Randall Wilhite told state District Judge Orlinda Naranjo that using his client Alex Jones’ on-air Infowars persona to evaluate Alex Jones as a father would be like judging Jack Nicholson in a custody dispute based on his performance as the Joker in “Batman.”

“He’s playing a character,” Wilhite said of Jones. “He is a performance artist.”

Alex Jones is, of course, an entertainer. He makes his living as a showman in the modern socio-political carnival, titillating the masses with horrorshow stories about wild conspiracies. Brother Boxer finds it difficult to listen to him, because Jones’ act is thoroughly histrionic, and his arguments full of looney appeals to emotion. Be that as it may, I trust he must have some appeal, as the fans I am acquainted with seem to love him.

alexjonesJones also has a significant audience. Roger Stone, a bigwig in the Trump campaign, cited Jones as “having more viewers than CNN or Fox News.” This is (for better and for worse) probably true.

With such pull, Jones could be a powerful force against the feminist excesses that exist in the divorce court system. Now that Jones is personally suffering from the excesses of the dictates of the family courts, one would expect that he would start talking about how men are routinely railroaded in such venues.

Why isn’t Jones filling the airwaves and his youtube channels full of antifeminist ranting? Why is he not investigating the family-destroying divorce courts?

It clearly isn’t because he has some ethical qualms about exposing the family law racket. This is a man who helped fabricate nonsensical stories about Satanic sex cults, rather than do a minimal bit of research on Hillary Clinton (an idiot who spouts so many bad ideas that taking her down would be a fish-barrell scenario). He’s no stranger to taking on all comers, and as The Man in The Orbital Castle reports, Jones admits that he plays fast and loose with the stories he tells.

The sad fact is that Alex Jones is a male feminist. He won’t buck the divorce racket, because he is beholden to the very system he pretends to rail against. Jones is proving himself, even now, to be the ultimate conformist. Even the threat of losing contact with his own children isn’t enough to compel him to lead some demonstrations against the divorce vultures.

Alex Jones has every opportunity to do something meaningful for America’s families and children — and yet he’s not doing it. I find this very interesting, and you should, too.


Melanie Phillips, a politically conservative, religious (Jewish) woman from the UK has begun crying tears about the fruits of feminism.

These so-called “antifeminist” religious women are a new phenomenon, erupting spontaneously after decades of feminist abuses. Their whiny antics are too little, too late. There are countless thousands of men (including Jewish men in the UK) who have already been raised by skank-ho single moms, and who have been run through the divorce-court meatgrinder.

We should never forget that wimminz, like this old Phillips broad, did not care a bit about the problems of feminism, before the natural consequences of their poisonous ideology became painful to women. Men have no positive duty to care about their plight now.

The Negative Dialectic (MGTOW)


As we have already seen, men are born with a complex series of conflicting drives. On one hand, a healthy man will naturally be drawn to women. Freud called this the life instinct. A healthy man will also have the impulse to compete, excel and assert himself on his environment. We’re calling this the renunciation instinct. Social forces in contemporary North America conspire to crush a man, once he enters into the socially constituted institution of marriage, which means that modern man is faced with a dilemma. This conflict is, by adolescence, largely constellated in the unconscious, due to the fact that any young man who even thinks about the reality of his situation is labeled a dangerous misogynist.

In short, if a man marries, he finds his freedom curtailed. If he seeks out his freedom, he must abandon his drive to marry and raise a family. There seems to be no middle ground without leaving North America. Moreover, while many men seek out foreign women in more traditional cultures (Communist Eastern Europe, Asia, Latin America) local forces of global capital have steadily meddled to inject feminism into these once-sane societies.


Thus there seems to be no place that is secure for men to fulfill all their masculine desires.

Why is this, Boxer? Why have women become so evil and psychopathic? The answer is probably as simple as money. Global capital and corporate power has found that by reducing men to a neurotic and somewhat helpless state, they can paralyze his rational functions, make him more docile, and increase consumption.

That expensive Polo t-shirt you bought last weekend was purchased, at least partly, because it would make you look good to the ladies. Likewise your overpriced car. Women, too, buy things for women’s approval. The possession of expensive consumer goods suggest to a woman’s peers that she has a man who is willing to invest heavily in her. The female herd is hierarchal and centers around grotesque displays of wealth.


The MGTOW man finds one avenue of resistance in the theoretical framework that is colloquially called ‘ghosting.’ Despite the inherent ambiguities, this is a good term. Because he desires the benefits of modern society, without incurring the penalties, The MGTOW seeks to become a ghost.

“The revolutionary,” declared Chinese revolutionary Mao Zedong, “swims in the seas of the people.” This seems to be a solution to the dilemma of the competing masculine drives of renunciation and family. By ghosting, the MGTOW man aspires to enjoy the benefits of contemporary society (medical and dental care, technology, etc.) without entering into any of the suicidal institutions which necessarily curtail his freedom.

If the telos of MGTOW is the ghosting life, then the telos of ghosting is the resolution of the psychological conflicts aroused by social and cultural demands. One would think that this resolution would bring peace, but it rarely seems to. There are several reasons for this, and we should enumerate a couple of the most obvious.

  • In the beginning, the young man who realizes the totality of the fraud that is perpetrated against men like him is often very angry. He gives himself over to conspiracy theorizing, often imagining that women are inherently evil. This is often a temporary phase, as no one can be upset for very long. This initial anger is rarely resolved without sublimation into the second obstacle…
  • After he settles down, the young man convinces himself that he can overturn the present social order and liberate other men if only he can reach them ideologically. He subsequently imagines MGTOW to be a potential mass movement which will eventually achieve political power.

In the first place, the young man must realize that women are not inherently evil. They’re just women. The differences between men and women (whether biological or social in origin) are real. Women and men are endowed with different strengths, and have different aims. A woman’s aim is to have children of her own, and this is probably just as strong an impulse as the masculine desire for autonomy.

In the second place, the young man must accept the fact that the present social order is not the result of some bizarre conspiracy. Feminism is not a new ideological creation of the Freemasons, (((Jews))), illuminati, etc. As Black Pill has pointed out many times, This is a particularly damaging misconception in itself, as it shifts the ultimate blame of female bad behavior onto men (Jewish men, Freemasons who are by definition not female, etc.)

In the third place, the young man should recognize that the desire to re-order society is a function of his own feelings of inadequacy. Carl Jung used to point out that neurotics often projected their own helplessness onto the world, and the desire to “fix” or “cure” others is often an ego-defensive excuse for one’s lack of concern about himself. This is why one sees certain people (both women and men) in an endless series of bad relationships.

Of course, the MGTOW man might take some socially beneficial role, but he won’t do it at his own expense. The first order of business in ghosting is to take care of oneself. Solving other people’s problems is a convenient excuse for not confronting one’s own issues.

Note: This is the second in a series of three articles about the social movement: MGTOW. It might help to read the first (here) before asking questions.