What Am I Doing Here?

Screen Shot 2019-04-14 at 18.14.41

I started this blog five years ago. Being the uncreative man that I am, I simply named it after the post code I was in when I hit the ‘submit’ button on the WordPress form. For the first year (or so), I had comments turned off. I didn’t really care if anyone else commented, because the comment sections I had experienced had problems that outweighed their benefits.

I had a blog before that, entitled La Prensa. In those very old days, I translated (with permission) articles written by men like W.F. Price and AfOR into French and Spanish, and tried to spread manosphere memes into minority communities. That blog was taken down after a kook named Rob Fedders attempted to “out” me as a professor at Simon Fraser University. Fedders contacted various feminist organizations, and tried to get this poor fellow fired. This man, who I had never met, and who certainly didn’t author any of my articles, probably got a ton of shit, simply because an insane incel suspected he was me.

I encourage everyone here to remain anonymous for a reason.

There are other threads to those early years. If one looks at my first real article, he can draw a distinct line to all the latest ones, and he’ll find that if anything is consistent here, it is my disdain for mass culture. This could easily be typecast as an anti-celebrity blog… something like the antithesis of People or Entertainment Tonight. In this regard, I’m following in the tradition of Adorno and Horkheimer, who also hated popular culture.

Plato constructed a healthy critique of actors and comedians 2500 years ago, and I hate them for many of the reasons he did. They’re people who make their living pretending to be things that they aren’t. They’re entitled to a living at their trade, but in our society, they’ve assumed positions of unearned respect and authority. Undermining the trend of honoring the unworthy is probably the most valuable thing any of us can do.

Down below, Derek writes:

I write as a counterpoint to your articles. I’m not refuting much; more providing another perspective.

I’m glad Derek is here, and he’s welcome to refute me as much as he likes. If someone doesn’t like Derek (or me), they are welcome to decamp.

From the beginning, I saw my blog as not competing with behemoths like The Spearhead, Dalrock or Roissy. One might assume, at first, that huge communities like these are blessed with a diversity that is impossible on a small blog like mine. Spending some time in those places will disabuse one of that silly notion immediately.

Dalrock’s blog is far too large to function as an effective community of men. Most of us know that intuitively.

Comment sections are strange things. As participation in such a venue increases, the potential for true diversity is rapidly outweighed by a selection toward conformity. As Dalrock becomes more popular, he attracts more angry nutters, more social outcasts, more loony misfits, and more dullwitted parasites. All these people end up as (more-or-less) free riders, simply there to agree and amplify. Thus, a dogmatic ideology starts taking shape, and everyone begins parroting the same buzz-words, and shouting down sensible dissidents.

This is even more evident at Roissy, which is much larger than Dalrock. Roissy has a staggering number of readers who participate in his comment section. Roissy’s commenters are so numerous that they have effectively subdivided themselves into cliquish subgroups. If discussion is difficult on Dalrock, it’s absolutely impossible on Heartiste, where people are petrified into opposing camps, all shouting at one another.

From the beginning, I saw V5K 2C2 as a sort of digital neighborhood: something closer to a mailing list or a ‘zine. I always knew the dangers of getting too big, but I’m especially wary of this now, for a specific reason that I didn’t foresee back in the early days.

white_nationalists

A couple of years ago, I noted people like Cane Caldo and SirHamster injecting white nationalism into discussions on Dalrock. The larger any forum becomes, the more prone it is to this sort of idiotic groupthink. I don’t want a petrified comment section, with hundreds of people chanting mantras in unison. If there is a motivator for a comment section to go down to destruction, white nationalism is it.

Since I’m criticizing white nationalists, I’ll quickly lay out my reasons why…

1. White nationalists are depressives. They constantly promote a defeatist attitude and immediately bring the general mood of every discussion down. According to white nationalists, society is run by a small minority of omnipotent super geniuses (known as Jews). Since these Jews control everything, white nationalists will insist that a young brother’s only recourse is to go commit suicide, preferrably immediately after some pathetic display of ultraviolence.

The problem with this thesis is obvious: it’s premises are untrue.

Screen Shot 2019-04-10 at 22.03.47

Dispelling the myth of Jewish superintelligence, one YouTube video at a time.

The guy who recently shot up a synagogue was surely groomed by these losers. None of the people he murdered were millionaires, or had high positions in political or social life. None of his victims seem particularly intellectually accomplished. They were just regular Americans, who went to work every day, and who had a different religious background.

2. White nationalists are anti-intellectual. Idiots like David Duke and Paul Nehlen are held up as authorities, despite the fact that they’re transparent grifters who are doing nothing but living off donations given them by their disciples. Points are argued and forwarded not on their merits, but merely on ideological grounds. White nationalists are, in this regard, very similar to feminists, in that they have a set of general grievances, and any proposition needs to fit within the script to be accepted. Any question that deviates from their narrative is rejected, and the questioner is self-righteously shouted down.

3. White nationalists are feminists by another name. I’ve covered this aspect for years, but it bears repeating, because this is a personal annoyance of mine. Go talk to some of these idiots and you’ll get the idea. Their precious white wimminz are to be worshipped as though they were goddesses, despite the fact that these same white wimminz are raising up a generation of white thugs and hoez, who are far more likely to steal my wallet than to get a job. Massive misbehavior like widespread divorce, chronic unemployment and welfare, single mom sluttery and drug abuse is glossed over with the flimsiest of excuses.

White nationalists have a couple of go-to responses to any question. Usually, when I criticize them even mildly, I am called a “race-traitor,” which is a meaningless term, given that my people don’t even consider the average white nationalist to be white. They’ll then admit that some of the things I’m saying are true, but immediately tell me that all their problems are the fault of a Jewish conspiracy. This is a response that is precisely similar to what I get from black nationalists and feminists, who whine about “white privilege” and “patriarchy” respectively.

Occasionally, a white nationalist will talk about a real problem, like ANTIFA. As an aside, ANTIFA is probably the only group that’s goonier and more pathetic than white nationalists, given that they’re pseudoleftists who are “protesting” on behalf of huge corporations.

I don’t want ANTIFA running roughshod through my comment section either. Even so, ANTIFA has no presence on the manosphere, so they’re not really my concern.

Every time Dalrock throws his blog into moderation, I get 10-20 new applicants. The last time this happened was last weekend. I could have approved twenty new commenters, and one of them might have fit in. Four of them would have repeatedly told Earl he’s a faggot for worshipping Mary, and five others would have told Jason he’s a faggot for not fucking random skanks, and the other ten would have started proselytizing for Stormfront, unironically talking about what a great guy Hitler was, and how the south should have won the American civil war.

So, my role here is not only as one of the authors, it’s also editorial. My goal is to maintain focus, and enforce some minimal intellectual standards. Derek will continue writing articles here for as long as it amuses him, and while everyone can read, I’ll continue to be selective about who gets to have a voice.

Author: Boxer

Sinister All-Male Dancer. Secret King of all Gamma Males. Member of Frankfurt School. Your Fave Contrarian!

9 thoughts on “What Am I Doing Here?”

  1. despite the fact that they’re transparent grifters who are doing nothing but living off donations given them by their disciples

    They are pretty much the male version of e-thots.

  2. “I’m glad Derek is here, and he’s welcome to refute me as much as he likes. If someone doesn’t like Derek (or me), they are welcome to decamp.”

    I appreciate the guest post format. I don’t have the time to produce writings daily, but I can certainly do the occasional post, perhaps once a week, give or take. I may be more tolerant of crazies than you are, most likely because of how many people think that I am crazy. I hope you don’t lose any good commenters (or fail to gain them) on account of my writing.

  3. I appreciate the guest post format. I don’t have the time to produce writings daily, but I can certainly do the occasional post, perhaps once a week, give or take.

    You should post when you have something to say, and you think this is the proper forum to say it in. You’re not the only author here, and you’ll note that none of those other people are meeting deadlines.

    I may be more tolerant of crazies than you are, most likely because of how many people think that I am crazy.

    I don’t mind eccentrics, provided they’re entertaining. The white nationalists who fall into the intersect space on that Venn diagram are very few. (Weev is one… RamZ Paul is another… and that’s honestly all I can think of…)

    I hope you don’t lose any good commenters (or fail to gain them) on account of my writing.

    The internet is packed with people who assume they belong everywhere. I have no idea what gave them this silly notion, but I have no desire to cater to it.

  4. I was going to make a sarcastic comment about boxer being a Jew, white power, and heading off to Argentina, but I assume few folks would know me well enough to be entirely sure whether I was being serious or in jest.
    So I’ll just share a random thought.
    The world was in fact set up by an inscrutable all-knowing God, then allowed to be spoiled, cursed, and led into rebellion by a powerful and intelligent evil force led by Satan. Some Jews are in fact quite intelligent, but more importantly, they are God’s chosen people. As God’s chosen people, No rebellion is more directly opposed to God, than when it is led by God’s own chosen people in direct rebellion to their Creator and the One who had the grace to choose them, undeservedly, to exhibit His power through, to all nations. I believe Satan delights in using apostate Jews(all who are not submitted to their Christ, Jesus of Nazareth) to debase the nations.
    Exhibit A: Hollywood, and it’s systematic degradation of America, and the world’s Judeo-Christian western culture.
    Yes the Jews are often the ones debasing the culture of the masses, but it isn’t because they are inherently prone to evil, any more so than all other races are, but because they are reflexively Satan’s chosen people for his rebellion to begin with. Satan chooses to use Jews, because God chose the Jews, and thus they are important to Satan’s defiance, because of their potential for nearness to God in this world, and Satan’s desire to corrupt God’s instruments. If Satan makes you despise the Jews, He has partly succeeded with His plan for you.

    Anyhow, after that heavy thought here is Psalm 51 sung in Latin. A bit of culture, to add some beauty to this day.

  5. I was going to make a sarcastic comment about boxer being a Jew, white power, and heading off to Argentina, but I assume few folks would know me well enough to be entirely sure whether I was being serious or in jest.

    To the Stormfront types, everyone who doesn’t agree with the narrative is Jewish. People have accused me of being Jewish for years. As though I wouldn’t just say so openly if it were the case (it’s not like it’s any more embarrassing than growing up with a bunch of fundamentalist Mormons.) I’m sure Jew613 and Avraham Rosenblum are both projectile vomiting at the possibility of a scoundrel like me being a covert member of the tribe.

    Yes the Jews are often the ones debasing the culture of the masses, but it isn’t because they are inherently prone to evil, any more so than all other races are, but because they are reflexively Satan’s chosen people for his rebellion to begin with. Satan chooses to use Jews, because God chose the Jews, and thus they are important to Satan’s defiance, because of their potential for nearness to God in this world, and Satan’s desire to corrupt God’s instruments.

    Everybody likes to think of themselves as divine instruments. Christians certainly do. I don’t see Jews as any more or less inherently moral than anabaptists. My hangup is seeing feminists blame wimminz behavior on Jews (by that I mean Jewish men).

    Think of it this way: Who is more damaging to the culture, Jews, or single mothers? I would be glad to debate that question all day, any time, anywhere, and I’ll have hard data and journal articles that support my side in the argument. If single mothers are a problem, and single mothers aren’t exclusively (or even predominantly) Jewish, then you have quite a burden pinning society’s dysfunction on Schlomo Shekelberg, the happy merchant. Of course, the Hipster Racists of the world don’t wanna go there. It would get in the way of their Church of The White Chick religion.

    Best,

    Boxer

  6. Who is more damaging to the culture, Jews, or single mothers?

    Probably whomever is creating single mothers.

  7. I don’t see Jews as any more or less inherently moral than anabaptists.

    Boxer, Come at me Bro! First ya “out” me, then you don’t even capitalize “Anabaptist”! And then you compare us to Jews!
    If I weren’t such a pacifist, I’d call the “Mennonite Mafia” on you. They’d show you the resisty side of non-resistance!

    So earl, while we’re outing each other’s denominations, did you appreciate that I stooped to link to some “Catholic” music?

  8. FYI earl. The reason I don’t capitalize your name, is because you don’t capitalize it.
    It bothers me to use it uncapitalized, but I try refer to people by their screen names, exactly as they appear.
    The compulsive part of me just wanted to let you know, that grates on me.

    Will you Catholics never quit abusing us like this?

Shout!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.