Brad Pitt Teaches Us About Wimminz

Screen Shot 2019-04-13 at 09.20.17

Surprise, surprise! A wimminz is having second thoughts after frivolously divorcing her man! That never happens, does it?

In August of 2014, Brad Pitt stupidly married a Hollywood skank named Angelina Jolie. That was a serious mistake on his part.

In the summer of 2016, after only two years of marriage, Angelina Jolie announced that she was dumping the sexiest man alive. She immediately started libelling her husband, Brad Pitt, in the press, even as she was getting on Tinder in order to ride playa dick.

Of course, Brad needed to keep funneling money to skank-ho princess. Just last year, Jolie went to the press and complained that Pitt was a deadbeat dad.

Screen Shot 2019-04-13 at 09.28.29

Pitt ponied up proof that he had paid something along the order of ten million dollars to his skank-ho slut, over the course of eighteen months.

Wouldn’t it be nice to be a uterus-American, and get paid eight figures for doing nothing?

Screen Shot 2019-04-13 at 09.10.54

At some point, skank-ho Angelina realized that yes, he was the best that she could pull. What was her reaction to this epiphany? Was it to humbly approach her husband, and beg forgiveness for a year of frivolous court proceedings? Did she apologize for all the trouble she caused?

Of course she didn’t. She’s using the power of the feminist state to continue torturing him, in a vain attempt to convince Pitt that “it’s cheaper to keep her…”

Screen Shot 2019-04-13 at 09.36.20

Marrying a wimminz has the potential to derail your life. The minute your beautiful wife finds it advantageous, she will summon all the power of the feminist state to bankrupt you and destroy your reputation. It’s imperative that every serious brother go into such a bargain knowing all the facts.

If the sexiest man alive can’t keep a wimminz happy for two short years, what chance do you have?

Author: Boxer

Sinister All-Male Dancer. Secret King of all Gamma Males. Member of Frankfurt School. Your Fave Contrarian!

9 thoughts on “Brad Pitt Teaches Us About Wimminz”

  1. If the sexiest man alive can’t keep a wimminz happy for two short years, what chance do you have?

    None

  2. If the sexiest man alive can’t keep a wimminz happy for two short years, what chance do you have?

    About the same chance any of us have keeping a tatted up (with one of the tats her ex’s name) twice divorced (before Pitt), feminist single mother who has fame and fortune.

  3. They were together for 12 years. I can’t say anything good about her, but let’s talk about Brad and wifeing up the single mother.

    At the beginning he insisted that the she let him adopt her kids. Bravo man, standing up for at least some of your patriarchal privilege. He is the father of all 6 children, adopted and biological.

    When it came to her or the kids, he chose the kids. He isn’t groveling and taking her back. It must hurt her badly to know that he doesn’t respect her or want her back, but he is still going to do his duty as father. Ironic plot twist.

    In summary, he got burned by marrying a single mother (surprise!), but didn’t give up his manhood or dignity. His errors: his specific choice of single mother, his failure to make her repent, and his spitting on marriage for a decade.

  4. I wonder if it’s the “source” or Angelina who is totally unclear what she wants. If Angelina wants to be “back in a relationship with him” and “be a family again”, then why would she want to be “making it so difficult for Brad with every detail of their divorce”?

    I suppose the easy (and most correct) answer is that, like most wimminz, Angelina has great difficulty connecting cause and effect.

  5. To be clear, I always support reunification. He should crush her in court and force her to repent. Then he should take her back, Hosea style.

    Some of his bad decisions make me question whether he is willing to do what it takes. As a fellow adoptive parent, I’m rooting for him.

  6. To be clear, I always support reunification. He should crush her in court and force her to repent. Then he should take her back, Hosea style.

    Derek is welcome to his own opinions, of course. I just gotta say that I think this is an awful idea, and not one that’s backed up in Derek’s bible, either. She’s already fucked a bunch of other men, and no less an authority than Saul of Tarsus himself gives Brother Brad permission to toss her into the gutter where she belongs.

    Pitt is a much nicer and better man than I am, and I don’t pass judgment on whatever he does or doesn’t do in this situation, but I wouldn’t condemn him for any number of reactions that I find personally reasonable, after this useless skank-ho tried to ruin his life and his family for sport.

  7. Paul does seem to imply that reunification is up to the discretion of the innocent party. Perhaps I should have said I always *support* reunification with conditions. I did give some examples of conditions. Clearly it isn’t a strict requirement. Remaining single is permitted.

  8. I suppose the easy (and most correct) answer is that, like most wimminz, Angelina has great difficulty connecting cause and effect.

    Yeah nothing brings a man back like making his life a living hell when he’s not coming back.

    Personally I think she’s just nuts and has pretty much been nuts since she started on the Hollyweird circuit.

  9. It’s Hollywood. It’s publicity. Remember the “beautiful Burtons” (Richard Burton and Liz Taylor), RIchard was a pompus jerk who would go around making a show about how “wonderful” they were and “only the best” for them…..and someone would dare come up and ask for an autograph and he was famous for then making a scene “Can’t we be treated like normal people? Can’t we go out without being bothered???”

    ANgelina Joile…..and no one seems to remember back in the late 1990’s when she and her then husband Billy-Bob would run around claiming they were vampires, and how they each kept a small vial of each others blood around their necks……and ‘Esquire’ did theur usual “women we love” spread….and in 1998 there’s Angelina Jolie……who looks nothing like she did back then. It’s a different person. That’s how much work she has had done. The pictures in the pread….she was clothed, but she was raunchy looking and her interview was full of crass words and was frankly pretty disgusting……and I even wasn’t a CHristian then and I was really turned off.

    What was the big deal???? She then stars in mov ie five years later with Brad Pitt “Mr and Mrs. Jones…..or Smith”(whatever) and suddenly she’s this “talented” and brillinat actress. Really??????? REALLY?

    Her and Brad adopt a bunch of kids……not from the over crowded orphanages in the USA…..no, no, no….we go to the third world and bring ’em back alive….and the little Asian boy, Angelie dresses up in girls clothing…….this is normal and accpeted by the entertainment press.

    There is a ton of money involved here, and that is the factor. Neither of them are spectacular parents……..if they adopted kids quietly and really made efforts to keep that out of “their image” I suppose I could have a tad of respect. It’;s Hollywood. “look at me!!!! look how nice I am! look at what an exceptional person I am!”

    I say this with a shaking head, but Brad probably is the better parent of the two. Brad probably could have had a better marriage if he dfidn’t go for the likes of Angelina, or a Jennifer Aniston type……

Comments are closed.