Груз 200 & Secular Patriarchy

Screen Shot 2018-02-24 at 08.00.36

Over on Fabius Maximus, Larry Kummer is having a hell of a time explaining simple concepts to idiotic CONservatives, who can’t seem to realize that child-support is a bad idea. Obviously, these morons tell us, wimminz will do what they want, and what wimminz want is to fuck thugs, nazi skinheads and layabouts. Wimminz want to bear children through these men, so that they can get on the fancy capitalist dole, get some food stamps, a crappy council flat, and thereby gain their independence at the ripe-old age of 15, so that they can start partying like they saw skank-ho mummy did, growing up. The moronic CONservatives assure us that we can’t change things, so we had better line up and keep paying for these idiot wimminz, as they crash our economy and collapse our society.

As Larry’s comment section illustrates, The CONservative’s dim peanut brain is incapable of formulating any solutions which don’t involve the feminist state, child support, and incentives for bad female behavior. Yet, pop-culture is replete with contemporary examples of secular patriarchy, that sidestep both religion and feminism, providing us tools to reconstruct a useful model of a more decent society.

l-gruz-200-1kbv3

Груз 200 (Freight 200) was a code word for shipments of corpses home during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Empires don’t like bad publicity, and corpses are some of the worst. It’s also the title of a film that was released, ten years ago (in 2008). I saw it in the theatre, when my Russian was passable. The fact that I remember the film is telling. It clearly made an impression on me.

I shouldn’t be able to understand most of it today. To the best of my knowledge, it has never been released in the west. If you speak Russian, see if you can find a copy on the torrents. It’s worth seeing for a thousand different reasons, most relevant to the manosphere is the following.

Груз 200 is a horror film set in the USSR in 1983-1984, supposedly based on true events. The protagonist is the captain of a local militia: the equivalent of a county sheriff in the U.S.A., who decides to abuse his position by raping and murdering the people he’s responsible for.

At the beginning of the movie Sheriff Psycho corners a sixteen-year old girl who had been visiting an illicit distillery to buy some contraband moonshine. Knowing she’s subject to arrest, she begs for leniency. Sheriff asshole has other plans, though, and tells her he’s going to rape her. She completely loses it at this point. She tells the Sheriff her father is an official in the local Communist Party machine, and that she’s a virgin.

If evidence comes to light that a woman had sex before marriage in the USSR, it would reflect on her parents. They’d lose their positions. This is a hallmark of a healthy society, in which women are held to normal standards.

Ask yourself what would happen to our own society if we implemented some of these cultural artifacts. What if we were to start firing people whose children went feral? Would our society improve?

The girl then tells her attacker that if she becomes pregnant out of wedlock, she’ll get sent to prison. This is another hallmark of a more sensible society. Sheriff Jagoff shows her a bit of mercy, at this point, and rapes her with an empty liquor bottle. He subsequently takes her to his house, and chains her to his bed.

What if we confiscated bastards in the hospital, and gave the children away to normal couples to raise, while we sent the mother to a work-camp, where she would be expected to pay back society for the resources she has squandered. Would this have a beneficial effect upon female behavior?

The girl threatens her captor with the only bit of leverage she has left: Her fiancé is a paratrooper, currently serving in Afghanistan. When he rotates back to the Soviet Union, she assures him, he’ll come for revenge. In fact, her boyfriend has already been killed. Notification to the family is classified (hence the code word for dead bodies). Sheriff Kook intercepts her boyfriend’s corpse, and throws it into bed with her.

gruz_200

The film has something of a happy ending. After another one of the Sheriff’s victims gets sick of his shit, she seeks out the help of the local Communist Party boss. The bureaucrat’s job is to arrest Sheriff Pervert for corruption and crimes against the people, but he’s not going to do any such thing…

Gruz-200-Cargo-200-movie-2007-Aleksey-Balabanov.-7

This is probably the funniest scene I’ve seen in any film. In the background, the local communist youth practice drill and ceremony, and there’s a banner that declares “Hail the All-Union Communist Party!” All this happens as Commissar Loser tells this woman (an actual worker) that he isn’t going to risk his cushy position to stop the Militia Captain from ripping her off, or framing her husband for things he didn’t do.

Knowing she has no other recourse, she goes home, gets her own AK-47 out of the garage,  drives over to the Sheriff’s house, and bursts in to splatter his guts all over the wall.

The Soviet Union was a horribly corrupt, dismal, and expansionist nation, and it wasn’t fit to survive (for all the reasons the film illustrates), but one thing they did not do there was tolerate feral wimminz and single mothers.

Груз_200_(постер)

As it happened in the year 1984

Author: Boxer

Secret King of all Gamma Males, Member of Frankfurt School, Your Fave Contrarian!

9 thoughts on “Груз 200 & Secular Patriarchy”

  1. “Ask yourself what would happen to our own society if we implemented some of these cultural artifacts. What if we were to start firing people whose children went feral? Would our society improve?”

    Every problem in our society today can in one way or another be traced back to the fact that we have severed the link between authority and responsibility. We don’t hold people accountable for their actions and pass on the punishment or consequences to others who, for one reason or another, continue to put up with it.

  2. “Ask yourself what would happen to our own society if we implemented some of these cultural artifacts. What if we were to start firing people whose children went feral? Would our society improve?”

    Society would certainly improve if sexual liberation was reeled back into marriage with the spouses only. It’s certainly not repression to not do it outside of marriage…it’s common sense.

    Once you take the boundaries off…the whole 80/20 thing rears it’s ugly head. The only solutions most men come up with is the 20% want to keep screwing all the women they can get and the 80% still want the taxpayers to pay for it.

    1. “Society would certainly improve if sexual liberation was reeled back into marriage with the spouses only. It’s certainly not repression to not do it outside of marriage…it’s common sense.”

      Why are islamic countries so shit and backwards then? I do not see how trapping women in marriage helps men, except for a few men who want to mate guard.

      Who cares about those anti social trad cons? They would let society burn to the ground so long as they could mate guard.

      1. ‘Why are islamic countries so shit and backwards then?’

        Among many things…they have loose/few sexual morals too. Things like sodomy, beastiality, pedophilia and rape. Why would you want that here?

      2. “Among many things…they have loose/few sexual morals too. Things like sodomy, beastiality, pedophilia and rape.”

        You just strawmanned me and asked me why I would like Islam over here, when I said it was shit and backwards. You are either mentally ill, or dishonest.

        It is a big leap to go from. “Islam is shirty and backwards to.” “Why do you want Islam here?” To take that implication from what i said, shows that you are gone in the head.

        So bestially is part of Islam? can you show me where/

        Apart from paedophilia,. Islam doesn’t condone any of the things you are talking about, you sound like a nut job looking to smear Islam. Also western traditionalists countries used to have child marriage, and cousin marriages.

        Islamic culture is about restricting sexuality, and you want to do that as well, how that would help men I do not know, but only deranged men want to do that.

      3. “Why do you want to trap men and women in sexual immorality then?”

        What nonsense is this?

        How can you trap someone in sexual immorality? Wot?

        you are a trad con, who is deeply obsessed with marraige.

        I object to marriage because it enslaves men, and forces burdens on them, while rewarding women.

        Abolish marriage.

        Also there is a lot of sexual degeneracy in Islamic countries, must likely due to the fact sexuality is suppressed.

        I want men free of these controls, so they have live a better life, not turning the clock back to 1800. (Something that can’t be done anyway.)

      4. Marriage is the place where God allows licit sex…outside of it, it enslaves people to sin.

        The state and society has turned things upside down to where it is perceived that sexual immorality with those who aren’t your spouse is freedom and marriage is enslavement. Spirtually, emotionally, and mentally this is not the case because God didn’t set it up that way.

      5. god is a fictional character.

        marriage is enslavement, it is a slavery contract for men.

        Since god is a fictional character, he did not set up marriage.

Comments are closed.