Pre-Nuptual Agreements

An interesting video for Monday…

Years ago, I wandered down to my local (back then it was west coast USA) divorce courts. On occasion I’d see some poor bastard trying in vain to enforce his agreement. On one occasion, I saw the judge not bat an eye, when he declared that: “in accord with the agreement signed prior to the marriage, petitioner will keep the house which was bequeathed him by his parents.” He then immediately declared: “Petitioner will buy respondent a house of equal or greater value within the next thirty days.”

Author: Boxer

Secret King of all Gamma Males, Member of Frankfurt School, Your Fave Contrarian!

9 thoughts on “Pre-Nuptual Agreements”

  1. Wee fynde it shockinge that in ye olden dayes wymyn were not allowede to testifie, or to contracte, or to holde propertie in their owne name.

    And our modern eyes show us that they are not capable of testifying, or of contracting, or of holding property in their own name.

  2. In no other arena does contract law mean absolutely zero.

    In addition .. no pea-nile-tittes enforced for the party in violation of said contract.

    Until we enforce contracts in marriage .. I can’t advise any young-man to par-take.

    Currently what we have in the west (particularly the USSofA) is Tyranny!

    1. ‘In addition .. no pea-nile-tittes enforced for the party in violation of said contract.’

      Well no court ordered penalties.

      The penalties for the instigator would most likely come from the Lord. That’s the just judge.

      1. The penalties for the instigator would most likely come from the Lord. That’s the just judge.

        I pray God holds it against them.

  3. The only downside to sugar daddy-ism…what if she has an ‘oops’.

    But that young woman in the video is what I would expect from a prostitute. I give it 9/10 odds she had a single mother growing up.

  4. In no other arena does contract law mean absolutely zero.

    Which effectively makes it null and void as law. Of course we don’t live in a society ruled by law, but in one ruled by tyrannical pseudo-legal fiats enforced at gunpoint.

    1. Just one example of lawlessness that is commonly used by wimminz to destroy men ..

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11912748/Guilty-until-proven-innocent-life-after-a-false-rape-accusation.html

      His own story was a messy affair. James says his wife accused him of rape as an added bargaining chip in ongoing divorce proceedings: “She told me to back off in the family courts – she was losing the case to have residency of our children. I said I wouldn’t. So she went down to the local police station and alleged that she’d been repeatedly raped by me during our marriage.”

      Even though cleared almost a year later .. he lost everything. And thought of sue-eye-side because of the pain & suffering.

      No man should be tore-mint-tit-ted with no recourse or redress.

Shout!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s